🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of states are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's childhood". A law may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked the legislature to enact a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," said the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust evidence".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and fit for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional government level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring guardian approval for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Apart from the West, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this global debate evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states internationally are no longer content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.