🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.